New Delhi: A controversy has erupted after a Facebook video featuring Prime Minister Narendra Modi was temporarily removed, prompting scrutiny from a Parliamentary Standing Committee. According to reports, the committee has sought an explanation from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and has reportedly given him 72 hours to respond and apologise over the incident.
The reported move comes amid concerns raised by lawmakers over the handling of content on Meta-owned platforms and the accountability of global technology companies operating in India.
Meta Cites Technical Glitch
Meta has stated that the removal of the Prime Minister’s video was the result of a technical glitch and not a deliberate moderation decision. The company has indicated that the issue was identified and corrected after it came to notice.
Despite the explanation, members of the Parliamentary Standing Committee have reportedly sought greater clarity on how such an incident occurred and what safeguards are in place to prevent similar errors in the future.
Safe Harbour Protection Under Discussion
According to reports, the committee has warned that if a satisfactory response is not received, it could recommend a review of Meta’s “safe harbour” protection in India.
Under India’s Information Technology framework, safe harbour protection shields online intermediaries from liability for third-party content, provided they comply with legal obligations and due diligence requirements.
Growing Focus on Platform Accountability
The episode has reignited the debate over the responsibilities of major social media platforms in content moderation, algorithmic transparency and compliance with Indian laws.
Lawmakers have emphasised the need for greater accountability from digital platforms, particularly in cases involving public institutions and elected representatives.
Awaiting Official Response
As of now, Meta has maintained that the removal was caused by a technical issue, while there has been no public statement from Mark Zuckerberg regarding the reported 72-hour deadline.
The matter is expected to remain under close watch as the Parliamentary Committee examines Meta’s response and considers any further recommendations.
